Usually when I write a review, I try to talk about specific things that make the thing I’m recommending unique or interesting. I don’t want to resort to platitudes and very general statements like “engrossing”, “excellent prose” or “gripping plot”, because that you can say about almost any book you like. The reason I started reading Malazan for example, is because someone said that they are epic fantasy books that are written like short stories. That caught my interest so I started reading them. With Momo by Michael Ende however, I have a harder time articulating myself. I feel like I can only talk in general terms if I don’t want to spoil too much. I don’t know how else to recommend this book than to say that it is an engrossing story, that the prose is excellent, the plot gripping, and the themes profound. Sometimes a book is just good in ways that are cliche to describe, without being cliche itself.

It is a children’s story that has that dreamy quality of wonder about it — it flows effortlessly between the ordinary and the fantastical, between the playfully whimsical and solemnly earnest, all while being rich in themes. I adore the style it is written in, how evocative it is while using very ordinary words. I reread it a year ago, after having read it once before as a kid. Before rereading it I didn’t realize how much that book must have meant to me when I first read it. Time after time it felt like the book was describing something about my own values and sensibilities in a way that felt nostalgic or familiar. In retrospect, I realize that I probably took a lot of inspiration from Momo while writing Living at the speed of spiders, so if you liked that one, you might also like Momo.


I would recommend that you just pick it up somewhere and start reading, but if you want more concreteness to be convinced, continue reading this post. I shall try to describe it in more detail.

The book is about Momo, a homeless girl that is newly arrived in town.

But one day, Momo notices that

Talking about general themes,

For people who’ve read the book:

References đź”—︎

Illich, Ivan. 1974. Energy and Equity. London, Calder & Boyars. http://archive.org/details/energyequity00illi.

Articles from blogs I follow around the net

Pluralistic: Unpersoned (22 Jul 2024)

Today's links Unpersoned: My latest Locus Magazine column. Hey look at this: Delights to delectate. This day in history: 2004, 2009, 2014, 2019 Upcoming appearances: Where to find me. Recent appearances: Where I've been. Latest books: You keep rea…

via Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow July 22, 2024

Sunday photoblogging: pigeon

via Crooked Timber July 21, 2024

Grow down

Psychologist James Hillman borrows from Plato and others and posits that we are each accompanied by a mystical, nonhuman being which accompanies us throughout our lives and through a series of whispers, nudges, accidents, silent exhortations, and mysterio…

via A Working Library July 20, 2024

11 · Universal comments

We experiment with adding a universal comment system that works across different apps.

via Ink & Switch July 19, 2024

Define Women! And Other Patriarchal Instructions

Some definitions. 1 “A woman has a vagina; a man has a penis” (some politicians, with a nod to “gender critical” feminists) 2 “A woman does not have a penis” (some politicians, with a nod to “gender critical” feminists) 3 … Continue reading →

via feministkilljoys July 10, 2024

Collecting Stories of Community-Led Change

Be Part of Something Bigger: Share Your Stories of Community-led Change for Resilience and Regeneration!

via News – Transition Network July 4, 2024

Generated by openring